When parents go through a divorce or custody dispute in Michigan, one of the most emotional concerns involves the children—especially when there are multiple siblings. Many parents worry about whether the court could order that brothers and sisters live apart.

In Michigan custody cases, keeping siblings together is generally preferred. However, there are situations where a judge may decide that separating siblings is in their best interests. Understanding how Michigan courts approach this issue can help parents better prepare for custody proceedings.

Michigan’s Focus: The Best Interests of the Child

In any custody case, Michigan courts base their decisions on the “best interests of the child.” Judges evaluate several statutory factors, including:

• The emotional ties between the child and each parent
• Each parent’s ability to provide love, guidance, and basic needs
• The stability of each home environment
• The child’s school, community, and home record
• The willingness of each parent to foster a relationship with the other parent

When siblings are involved, the court also considers the importance of preserving sibling relationships.

Is It Common for Siblings to Be Separated?

It is not common for Michigan courts to separate siblings. Courts generally recognize that sibling bonds provide emotional support, stability, and continuity—especially during a family transition like divorce.

Judges typically presume that keeping siblings together serves their emotional and developmental well-being. As a result, separating brothers and sisters usually requires strong evidence that doing so would better serve one or more children.

When Might a Court Separate Siblings?

Although uncommon, sibling separation can occur in certain circumstances, such as:

• Significant conflict or tension between siblings
• Different emotional or medical needs requiring separate living arrangements
• A child’s strong preference, depending on age and maturity
• A substantial difference in parenting relationships with each parent
• Evidence that living together would harm one of the children

For example, if one child has special needs that are better met in one household, or if siblings have a highly strained relationship that negatively affects their well-being, the court may consider separate custody arrangements.

The Role of Sibling Bonds in Court Decisions

Michigan courts often view sibling relationships as vital to a child’s development. Judges may consider:

• The closeness of the siblings
• The amount of time they have lived together
• Whether they share daily routines, school environments, and activities
• The emotional impact separation may have

In many cases, even if primary custody differs between parents, courts may attempt to structure parenting time so siblings spend significant time together.

How Parents Can Address the Issue

If you are concerned about the possibility of siblings being separated, it is important to present clear evidence about why keeping them together supports their best interests—or, if necessary, why separation may be appropriate.

This may include:

• Testimony regarding sibling bonds
• School or counseling records
• Documentation of special needs
• Evidence of each parent’s ability to meet specific needs

Custody disputes involving multiple children can become complex, especially if each child’s circumstances differ.

Legal Guidance for Families in Southfield

At Zanolli Family Law, P.C, we can provide legal assistance to the Southfield public in child custody matters, including cases involving multiple children and sibling placement concerns. We understand how important family relationships are and work to help parents pursue arrangements that protect their children’s well-being.

If you are facing a custody dispute and have questions about whether siblings may be separated, seeking knowledgeable legal guidance can help you better understand your rights and options under Michigan law.